On 11 August 2025, India’s Supreme Court issued a directive that stunned animal rescuers, caregivers, and ordinary citizens: civic authorities across Delhi and the National Capital Region were ordered to remove free-roaming animals from public spaces and house them in shelters within eight weeks, with an explicit instruction that animals not be released back to the streets. The ruling, intended as an emergency response to rising bite and rabies incidents, has instantly reopened a fraught national debate about how cities manage animal populations, and whether the law meant to protect animals has been sidelined in the name of public safety.
This is not only a story of policy and procedure. For millions of residents, the court’s decision threatens the quiet bonds formed between people and the animals they have fed, sheltered, and named. As an NGO that has worked on the ground for years, Earthlings Trust writes from grief and from practical knowledge: to remove dogs in Delhi NCR from neighbourhoods without an evidence-based, well-resourced plan risks both human safety and animal dignity.
Origins of India’s humane approach: the ABC framework
India’s modern legal approach to free-roaming dogs traces back to the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, which created the statutory space for welfare rules. Under this Act, the central government framed the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, first notified in 2001, which set out the humane programme now familiar across the country: capture, sterilise, vaccinate, treat, and release the animals back to their original territories. The ABC model rested on the twin goals of reducing population growth humanely and maintaining immunised, territorial dogs that reduce unpredictable movement and ecological disruption.
Despite its clear intent, ABC was always a rule that required local investment and meticulous execution. The Animal Welfare Board of India, state governments, and NGOs developed handbooks, SOPs, and training modules to standardise capture techniques, surgical protocols, and post-operative care, but implementation varied widely. Over two decades, ABC worked where there was political will, funding, and oversight; in other areas, limited budgets, lack of trained veterinary personnel, and overwhelmed municipal systems made the programme sporadic and ineffective. Multiple studies and reviews have warned that poor implementation, not the ABC idea itself, is the primary weakness.
Renewed rules and growing public anxiety
In March 2023, the Centre updated the ABC rules and related animal-welfare regulations, seeking to strengthen standards and oversight. The 2023 regulations attempted to close gaps in veterinary standards, reporting and monitoring, and to make sterilisation and vaccination more systematic. Yet these technical improvements could not instantly solve the deeper problem: chronic infrastructural shortfalls and a rising number of bite incidents in some urban pockets, stoked by media coverage and public anxiety. Critics argue that despite the 2023 rule updates, implementation on the ground remained weak — a point repeatedly highlighted during hearings that preceded the recent top-court action.
The legal tug-of-war: rules, precedent, and emergency judicial action
Across India, High Courts and state authorities have intermittently ordered accelerated sterilisation drives, better shelter facilities, and progress reports, reflecting worry as much as consensus on humane control measures. Yet the Supreme Court’s August directive marks a dramatic pivot: faced with reports of rising deaths and bite incidents, the bench described the situation as urgent. It effectively overrode the practical norm of release-back policies in favour of mass relocation. Some have presented the order as a necessary assertion of state duty to protect human life; others see it as an overreach that contradicts the statutory ABC framework and the spirit of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Legal scholars have already pointed to tensions between the 2001/2023 ABC rules and the emergency judicial fiat tensions that may themselves become the subject of further litigation.
Implementation realities: why relocation is so fraught
Estimates cited in media and municipal reports place hundreds of thousands of free-roaming dogs in the Delhi NCR region; municipal kennel capacity counts only in the low thousands. Shelters, whether municipal or run by NGO, vary dramatically in capacity, standards, and funding. Many already operate at or beyond capacity and rely on volunteer networks and patchy donations. Forcing mass relocation without an immediate, massive increase in shelter infrastructure, funding, and trained staff risks overcrowding, disease outbreaks, chronic neglect, and, in the worst cases, euthanasia outcomes that would strike at the very humane principles courts and policymakers profess to uphold.
The human and ecological ripple effects
The court’s action is framed as protecting human life: indeed, the risk to children and vulnerable adults from dog bites and rabies is real and must be addressed. But removing territorial animals abruptly produces secondary ecological effects, shifts in rodent populations, changes in urban scavenging behaviour, and new interactions with other wildlife that public health planners have not fully modelled. Socially, the move severs informal care networks: neighbours who have quietly maintained feeding regimes or sheltered injured dogs may be thrust into conflict with authorities. Those social ties were often the last safety net for wounded animals; losing them means losing both community vigilance and local knowledge essential for humane management.
Earthlings Trust: mourning, mobilising, and a promise
As Earthlings Trust, we grieve. We see the eye contact, the trusting loll of a head onto a rescuer’s lap, the small acts of kindness that stitch a dog’s life to a neighbourhood. We also know, from years of sterilisation drives and rescue work, what humane, evidence-based intervention looks like and what happens when it is neglected.
We call for four immediate requirements: transparency in how animals are captured and housed; independent audits of any shelter used; urgent scaling of veterinary capacity for sterilisation and rabies vaccination; and legal protection for caregivers, not criminalisation. Earthlings Trust commits to expanding our helpline and foster network, to offer medical teams for humane capture and ABC drives, and to partner with municipal bodies to audit shelter standards. We will shelter, feed, and medically treat animals removed from the streets and insist on humane, lifelong care for any dog that cannot be rehomed.
A humane pathway forward
If public safety is the objective, there are integrated alternatives that do not trade one kind of harm for another. Targeted, well-funded ABC drives in hotspots; creation of community-managed feeding points; formal registration and support for local caretakers; rapid-response bite clinics; and transparent, audited shelters scaled up with central funding. These steps combined can reduce risk while preserving dignity. Policy must marry urgency with expertise: rushed relocations without veterinary oversight and social planning will fail both animals and people.
Conclusion: grief as a catalyst, not an excuse
This moment asks a painful question: will grief and fear drive cruelty, or will they compel us to build better systems? The answer will determine not only the future of dogs in Delhi NCR but the moral shape of our cities. Earthlings Trust will keep its doors open, keep rescuing, and keep pressing for humane, evidence-based solutions. We mourn every frightened animal taken from a familiar street; we also plead for a policy that protects human life without erasing animal life.
The Supreme Court order may have set a timetable, but it cannot and must not set aside the rule of law, scientific best practice, and humane care. If we respond with calm commitment rather than panic, we can protect people and preserve the dignity of animals that live among us. For the dogs in Delhi NCR, the coming weeks will be a test of our compassion. For our city, this will be a test of its soul.
Never Miss News